Back to CVE records
Not yet scoredPublished Oct 23, 2026

CVE-2026-98955flow_dissector: avoid u16 truncation of skb->len when computing thoff

Updated under an hour ago ()

Does this affect you?

It affects Linux. Add what you run to find out whether that includes you.

No exploitation reported and no EPSS estimate yet.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: flow_dissector: avoid u16 truncation of skb->len when computing thoff __skb_flow_dissect() computes key_control->thoff using: key_control->thoff = min_t(u16, nhoff, skb ? skb->len : hlen); min_t(u16, ...) casts both arguments to u16 before comparing them. Whenever skb->len (or hlen) modulo 65536 is smaller than nhoff, the truncated length wins and thoff is set to a bogus small value, even when the dissection succeeded. For example, an IPv4/TCP frame with skb->len == 65540 and nhoff == 34 gets thoff == 4, so callers such as skb_probe_transport_header() point the transport header inside the Ethernet header. Such skbs are not exotic: - At the time of commit d0c081b49137 ("flow_dissector: properly cap thoff field"), AF_PACKET with PACKET_VNET_HDR could already build GSO skbs larger than 64KB (MTU checks are skipped for GSO, and alloc_skb_with_frags() accepted up to MAX_SKB_FRAGS (17) order-0 pages on top of the linear part). - BIG TCP now makes skbs larger than 64KB common. - The following patch makes tun_get_user() dissect IFF_TAP frames before eth_type_trans() pulls the Ethernet header, so a GSO frame carrying a 65522..65535 byte L3 packet will be dissected with skb->len in [65536, 65549]. Compare as u32 instead. If the resulting offset cannot be represented in the u16 key_control->thoff, cap it to U16_MAX and report the dissection as failed rather than silently returning a wrong transport offset. thoff is still set on failure, as some callers (such as eth_get_headlen()) use it regardless of the return value.

CVSS
Not yet scored
Weakness (CWE)
Not given
Known exploited
Not in CISA's KEV catalog
EPSS (exploitation in the next 30 days)
Not loaded for this CVE
Assigned by
Linux
NVD analysis
Received
Record last updated
Oct 23, 2026
First seen by InfoSec Signals
Oct 23, 2026

Affected products

Affected products
Linux Linux
linux:linux (from the name)
from d0c081b49137cd3200f2023c0875723be66e7ce5 before d9e08836d06c84abb18470c94b12b131eaccdc7d; from d0c081b49137cd3200f2023c0875723be66e7ce5 before 50d0cd575cab763f833d6ac6eb6550b23a0b3dae; from d0c081b49137cd3200f2023c0875723be66e7ce5 before 9993e6a0ac1b5b3101ffba702cacb9f42b9909d8; from d0c081b49137cd3200f2023c0875723be66e7ce5 before 52efce4755a4b8b82039caa773645ffc80b25362; from d0c081b49137cd3200f2023c0875723be66e7ce5 before 99bda1ecbd56905f8bd934b9cdccd3bd251192b1; d35cd5e279881ec36ff8cd82a2d9caebc0cce3fc; eecfa2eeefe3caef4c8d6b2284f6066c76ab26a1; 80f327285cab6ab8e10c3ea03278add5dd99fb02; and 3 more ranges
CNA record

References

References

The CVE record is authoritative. Products marked “from the name” were identified from the CNA's free-text names, not a CPE, and are matched less certainly. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.

Your cookie choices
We use essential cookies to run this site, and, only with your consent, an advertising cookie from Google to measure whether our ads lead to sign-ups and subscriptions. See our for details.