Back to CVE records
High 7.7Published Oct 23, 2026

CVE-2026-99059wireguard: noise: reject response consumption after intermediate initiation

Updated under an hour ago ()

Does this affect you?

It affects Linux. Add what you run to find out whether that includes you.

EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.21%, higher than 10% of scored CVEs.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: wireguard: noise: reject response consumption after intermediate initiation Two threads begin processing the identical response message, received twice. The first thread, A, runs. While it's running, the second one, B, gets partway through, and during that slow calculation, or even while blocking on down_write(), A completes and then also a handshake initiation that's already been queued up runs in thread C, which itself takes that same down_write(). The handshake initiation creation succeeds, and sets the state back to waiting-for-response, and calls up_write(), at which point thread B resumes, because either its finished its calculations or was finally allowed to acquire down_write(). Thread B then copies the state back to the peer, and begins a new session, using that state, which is the same session as the one made in thread A. Thread A Thread B Thread C down_read() sA = handshake->state memcpy(cA, handshake->crypto) up_read() if (sA != 1) goto fail slow_crypto(cA) down_read() sB = handshake->state memcpy(cB, handshake->crypto) up_read() if (sB != 1) goto fail slow_crypto(cB) down_write() if (sA != handshake->state) goto fail memcpy(handshake->crypto, cA) handshake->state = 2 up_write() down_write() if (handshake->state != 2) goto fail derive_session(handshake->crypto) up_write() down_write() slow_crypto(handshake->crypto) handshake->state = 1 up_write() down_write() if (sB != handshake->state) goto fail memcpy(handshake->crypto, cB) handshake->state = 2 up_write() down_write() if (handshake->state != 2) goto fail derive_session(handshake->crypto) up_write() This seems basically impossible to hit in a meaningful way in practice, but ensure that it absolutely cannot happen by comparing the ephemeral private key that's on the stack with the latest one that the peer's handshake state has.

CVSS
7.7 HIGH (v3.1, CNA)CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Weakness (CWE)
Not given
Known exploited
Not in CISA's KEV catalog
EPSS (exploitation in the next 30 days)
0.21% (percentile 10)
Assigned by
Linux
NVD analysis
Received
Record last updated
Oct 24, 2026
First seen by InfoSec Signals
Oct 23, 2026

Affected products

Affected products
Linux Linux
linux:linux (from the name)
from e7096c131e5161fa3b8e52a650d7719d2857adfd before fb5ce4c7790c3eeec820302d08d70ecf46af4295; from e7096c131e5161fa3b8e52a650d7719d2857adfd before c76a80db593096edf2b3b3972f58b6342a8c6c04; from e7096c131e5161fa3b8e52a650d7719d2857adfd before 4d64a3d6e96aa78619c9c29ffde309794974588a; from e7096c131e5161fa3b8e52a650d7719d2857adfd before 3bec3d32c2a3afd164fc87f95457df2cf9049c20; from e7096c131e5161fa3b8e52a650d7719d2857adfd before d0305f8d90029556260c6824b61c493c424eba9e
CNA record

References

References

The CVE record is authoritative. Products marked “from the name” were identified from the CNA's free-text names, not a CPE, and are matched less certainly. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.

Your cookie choices
We use essential cookies to run this site, and, only with your consent, an advertising cookie from Google to measure whether our ads lead to sign-ups and subscriptions. See our for details.